« Benton Ryalls 2016 » : différence entre les versions
m (→3. Mots-clés) |
m (→2. Copies) |
||
| Ligne 25 : | Ligne 25 : | ||
== 2. Copies == | == 2. Copies == | ||
* '''Copie en ligne''' : http://ideaedu.org/ | * '''Copie en ligne''' : http://www.ideaedu.org/Portals/0/Uploads/Document/Challenging_Misconceptions_About_Student_Ratings_of_Instruction.pdf | ||
<!-- Si l'article est disponible sur Internet, mettre l'URL --> | <!-- Si l'article est disponible sur Internet, mettre l'URL --> | ||
| Ligne 35 : | Ligne 35 : | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
== 3. Mots-clés == | == 3. Mots-clés == | ||
<!-- Mettre ici la liste de sujets sur lesquels porte l'article, entre doubles crochets, afin de pouvoir retrouver les publications par sujet.--> | <!-- Mettre ici la liste de sujets sur lesquels porte l'article, entre doubles crochets, afin de pouvoir retrouver les publications par sujet.--> | ||
Dernière version du 24 mars 2017 à 18:13
Challenging Misconceptions About Student Ratings of Instruction
1. Références
- Référence complète APA : Benton, S., & Ryalls, K. (2016). Challenging Misconceptions About Student Ratings of Instruction. Idea Papers 58. Manhattan, KS: The IDEA Center.
- Auteur(s) : Stephen Benton, Kenneth Ryalls
- Revue :
2. Copies
- Copie en ligne : http://www.ideaedu.org/Portals/0/Uploads/Document/Challenging_Misconceptions_About_Student_Ratings_of_Instruction.pdf
- Copie locale : Fichier:Benton Ryalls 2016.pdf
- Copie physique :
3. Mots-clés
4. Abstract
Data from student ratings of instruction (SRI) are used ubiquitously as a key element in providing instructors with valuable feedback and evaluators with critical student input. Nonetheless, calls for the elimination of SRI continue to appear in academic journals and higher education periodicals. This paper brings to bear the huge body of research on SRI to which so many academics and institutions have contributed. Some of the most egregiously erroneous statements about SRI are rebutted with brief reviews of the readily available compelling evidence. Although some faculty frustrations about misuse of SRI are valid, we argue that inclusion of student voice is critical. Students can provide useful feedback because they have firsthand experience over multiple occasions of what actually occurred in the classroom. Recommendations are made for best practices in using SRI as one of many sources for improving and evaluating teaching.
5. Résumé (facultatif)
Une revue de la littérature sur l'évaluation de l'enseignement de 1970 à 2010.