|
|
| Ligne 1 : |
Ligne 1 : |
| [[Catégorie:article]] | | [[Catégorie:Page à supprimer]] |
| | |
| <!-- La catégorie article est une sous-catégorie de référence. Elle inclut les articles publiés dans des revues ou des journaux.-->
| |
| | |
| = Learning styles: Concepts and evidence =
| |
| <!-- Mettre le titre supra pour qu'il apparaisse en grand au sommet de la page -->
| |
| | |
| | |
| == 1. Références ==
| |
| | |
| * '''Référence complète APA''' : Paschler, H., McDaniel, M., Rohrer, D. and Bjork, R. (2010) Learning styles: Concepts and evidence. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 9/3, pp. 105-119.
| |
| <!-- Rappel de la syntaxe :
| |
| * Auteur, A. A., Auteur, B. B., & Auteur, C. C. (Année). Titre de l'article. Titre du périodique, volume(numéro), page de début - page de fin.
| |
| * Rousseau, F. L., & Vallerand, R. J. (2003). Le rôle de la passion dans le bien-être subjectif des ainés. Revue québécoise de psychologie, 24(3), 197-211.
| |
| -->
| |
| | |
| * '''Auteur(s)''' : [[Harold Pashler]], [[Mark McDaniel]], [[Doug Rohrer]], & [[Robert Bjork]]
| |
| <!-- Remettre ici le ou les auteurs au format Prénom Nom, entre doubles crochets, afin de pouvoir retrouver les publications par auteur.-->
| |
| | |
| * '''Revue''' : [[Psychological Science in the Public Interest]]
| |
| <!-- Remettre ici le nom de la revue, entre doubles crochets, afin de pouvoir retrouver les publications par revue.-->
| |
| | |
| <br>
| |
| | |
| == 2. Copies ==
| |
| | |
| * '''Copie en ligne''' : http://www.psychologicalscience.org/journals/pspi/PSPI_9_3.pdf
| |
| <!-- Si l'article est disponible sur Internet, mettre l'URL -->
| |
| | |
| * '''Copie locale''' : [[Fichier:Paschler McDaniel et al 2010.pdf]]
| |
| <!-- Idéalement, stocker une copie locale du fichier dans le wiki (en respectant les conventions de nommage du fichier) et faire ici le lien -->
| |
| | |
| * '''Copie physique''' :
| |
| <!-- Si une copie physique existe (ex tirage papier), indiquer ici sa localisation et sa référence -->
| |
| | |
| <br>
| |
| == 3. Mots-clés ==
| |
| | |
| <!-- Mettre ici la liste de sujets sur lesquels porte l'article, entre doubles crochets, afin de pouvoir retrouver les publications par sujet.-->
| |
| * [[style d'apprentissage]]
| |
| | |
| | |
| <br>
| |
| | |
| == 4. Abstract ==
| |
| | |
| <!-- Copier / coller ici l'abstract -->
| |
| SUMMARY—The term ‘‘learning styles’’ refers to the concept
| |
| that individuals differ in regard to what mode of instruction
| |
| or study is most effective for them. Proponents of
| |
| learning-style assessment contend that optimal instruction
| |
| requires diagnosing individuals’ learning style and tailoring
| |
| instruction accordingly. Assessments of learning
| |
| style typically ask people to evaluate what sort of information
| |
| presentation they prefer (e.g., words versus pictures
| |
| versus speech) and/or what kind of mental activity
| |
| they find most engaging or congenial (e.g., analysis versus
| |
| listening), although assessment instruments are extremely
| |
| diverse. The most common—but not the only—hypothesis
| |
| about the instructional relevance of learning styles is the
| |
| meshing hypothesis, according to which instruction is best
| |
| provided in a format that matches the preferences of the
| |
| learner (e.g., for a ‘‘visual learner,’’ emphasizing visual
| |
| presentation of information).
| |
| The learning-styles view has acquired great influence
| |
| within the education field, and is frequently encountered
| |
| at levels ranging from kindergarten to graduate school.
| |
| There is a thriving industry devoted to publishing learning-
| |
| styles tests and guidebooks for teachers, and many
| |
| organizations offer professional development workshops
| |
| for teachers and educators built around the concept of
| |
| learning styles.
| |
| The authors of the present review were charged with
| |
| determining whether these practices are supported by
| |
| scientific evidence. We concluded that any credible validation
| |
| of learning-styles-based instruction requires robust
| |
| documentation of a very particular type of experimental
| |
| finding with several necessary criteria. First, students
| |
| must be divided into groups on the basis of their learning
| |
| styles, and then students from each group must be randomly
| |
| assigned to receive one of multiple instructional
| |
| methods. Next, students must then sit for a final test that is
| |
| the same for all students. Finally, in order to demonstrate
| |
| that optimal learning requires that students receive instruction
| |
| tailored to their putative learning style, the
| |
| experiment must reveal a specific type of interaction between
| |
| learning style and instructional method: Students
| |
| with one learning style achieve the best educational
| |
| outcome when given an instructional method that differs
| |
| from the instructional method producing the best outcome
| |
| for students with a different learning style. In
| |
| other words, the instructional method that proves most
| |
| effective for students with one learning style is not the most
| |
| effective method for students with a different learning
| |
| style.
| |
| Our review of the literature disclosed ample evidence
| |
| that children and adults will, if asked, express preferences
| |
| about howthey prefer information to be presented to them.
| |
| There is also plentiful evidence arguing that people differ
| |
| in the degree to which they have some fairly specific aptitudes
| |
| for different kinds of thinking and for processing
| |
| different types of information. However, we found virtually
| |
| no evidence for the interaction pattern mentioned
| |
| above, which was judged to be a precondition for validating
| |
| the educational applications of learning styles. Although
| |
| the literature on learning styles is enormous, very
| |
| few studies have even used an experimental methodology
| |
| capable of testing the validity of learning styles applied to
| |
| education. Moreover, of those that did use an appropriate
| |
| method, several found results that flatly contradict the
| |
| popular meshing hypothesis.
| |
| We conclude therefore, that at present, there is no adequate
| |
| evidence base to justify incorporating learningstyles
| |
| assessments into general educational practice. Thus,
| |
| limited education resources would better be devoted to
| |
| adopting other educational practices that have a strong
| |
| evidence base, of which there are an increasing number.
| |
| However, given the lack of methodologically sound studies
| |
| of learning styles, it would be an error to conclude that all
| |
| possible versions of learning styles have been tested and
| |
| found wanting; many have simply not been tested at all.
| |
| | |
| | |
| <br>
| |
| == 5. Résumé (facultatif) ==
| |
| | |
| <!-- Entrer ici un résumé personnel de l'article (facultatif) -->
| |
| | |
| Un article qui remet en cause la théorie selon laquelle l'enseignement devrait s'adapter aux styles d'apprentissage des étudiants, montrant qu'il n'y a pas de base empirique solide pour défendre cette assertion.
| |
