« Subramony Molenda et al 2014c » : différence entre les versions

De wikicap
Aucun résumé des modifications
 
Ligne 54 : Ligne 54 :


<!-- Entrer ici un résumé personnel de l'article (facultatif) -->
<!-- Entrer ici un résumé personnel de l'article (facultatif) -->
Le résumé infra est copié du blog de [[Will Thalheimer]], entrée "Mythical Retention Data & The Corrupted Cone", 5/1/2015 (https://www.worklearning.com/2015/01/05/mythical-retention-data-the-corrupted-cone/)


"The authors of the article provide a series of brief synopses of the major players who have been cited as sources of the bogus data and corrupted visualizations. The goal here is to give you—the reader—additional information so you can make your own assessment of the credibility of the research sources provided."


<br>
<br>
== 6. Voir aussi ==
== 6. Voir aussi ==

Dernière version du 14 avril 2018 à 17:15


The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: A Bibliographic Essay on the Corrupted Cone

1. Références

  • Référence complète APA : Subramony, D., Molenda, M., Betrus, A., and Thalheimer, W. (2014c). The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: A Bibliographic Essay on the Corrupted Cone. Educational Technology, Nov/Dec 2014, 54(6), 22-31.
  • Auteur(s) :
  • Revue :



2. Copies

  • Copie en ligne :
  • Copie physique :



3. Mots-clés



4. Abstract


5. Résumé (facultatif)

Le résumé infra est copié du blog de Will Thalheimer, entrée "Mythical Retention Data & The Corrupted Cone", 5/1/2015 (https://www.worklearning.com/2015/01/05/mythical-retention-data-the-corrupted-cone/)

"The authors of the article provide a series of brief synopses of the major players who have been cited as sources of the bogus data and corrupted visualizations. The goal here is to give you—the reader—additional information so you can make your own assessment of the credibility of the research sources provided."


6. Voir aussi