« Hoeft 2012 » : différence entre les versions

De wikicap
Aucun résumé des modifications
 
Ligne 18 : Ligne 18 :
<!-- Remettre ici le ou les auteurs au format Prénom Nom, entre doubles crochets, afin de pouvoir retrouver les publications par auteur.-->
<!-- Remettre ici le ou les auteurs au format Prénom Nom, entre doubles crochets, afin de pouvoir retrouver les publications par auteur.-->


* '''Revue''' : [[International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning]]
* '''Revue''' : [[International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching & Learning]]
<!-- Remettre ici le nom de la revue, entre doubles crochets, afin de pouvoir retrouver les publications par revue.-->
<!-- Remettre ici le nom de la revue, entre doubles crochets, afin de pouvoir retrouver les publications par revue.-->



Dernière version du 1 mai 2015 à 17:01


Why University Students Don't Read: What Professors Can Do To Increase Compliance

1. Références

  • Référence complète APA : Hoeft, M. E. (2012). Why University Students Don't Read: What Professors Can Do To Increase Compliance, International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 6/2, Article 12.


2. Copies

  • Copie physique :


3. Mots-clés



4. Abstract

This article reports findings from two studies assessing reading compliance among first semester freshmen at a small Midwestern two-year liberal arts university. The first study assessed reading compliance of students enrolled in two sections of First Year Seminar, finding that 46% of students reported that they read assignments, yet only 55% of those students were able to demonstrate the most basic level of comprehension of the material they claimed to have read. Reasons most frequently cited by students to explain their failure to read and advice that noncompliant readers say will increase their compliance are identified. The second study assessed reading compliance in a 3-course learning community of first semester freshmen, incorporating one piece of noncompliant reader advice in each of the courses, finding that quizzes and graded journals greatly increased reading compliance.



5. Résumé (facultatif)


6. Voir aussi