« Melland 1996 » : différence entre les versions
| Ligne 80 : | Ligne 80 : | ||
<!-- Entrer ici un résumé personnel de l'article (facultatif) --> | <!-- Entrer ici un résumé personnel de l'article (facultatif) --> | ||
* Une des études montrant l'absence de corrélation entre performance en recherche et en enseignement (vs le mythe "Un bon chercheur fait un bon enseignant") | |||
* Intéressant aussi pour le petit cas initial où Melland compare deux enseigants imaginaires, Pr Jones et Pr Smith, l'un dans une optique qui semble donner raison <br> | |||
The purpose of this study was to investigate the | |||
relationship between the research productivity and | |||
teaching effectiveness of baccalaureate nurse educators. | |||
This was a nonexperimental, correlational, retrospective | |||
study. Sixty baccalaureate nurse educators | |||
completed a questionnaire that assessed their research | |||
productivity and administered a teaching effectiveness | |||
questionnaire to all students in their classes | |||
in a given week. No relationship of significance was | |||
found between faculty research productivity and teaching | |||
effectiveness. Faculty at research institutions were | |||
found to be significantly higher research producers | |||
than faculty at either comprehensive or liberal arts | |||
institutions. No significant difference was found in the | |||
teaching effectiveness between faculty employed at | |||
research, comprehensive, or liberal arts institutions. | |||
Recommendations included (1) broadening the definition | |||
of research to include the scholarship of integration, | |||
discovery, application, and teaching; (2) implementation | |||
of two career tracks for faculty in higher | |||
education, with different reward structures for each; | |||
and (3) allowing the academic department as opposed | |||
to individual faculty to be the basic unit of evaluation. | |||
== 6. Voir aussi == | == 6. Voir aussi == | ||
Version du 13 juin 2016 à 09:02
Titre de l'article
1. Références
- Référence complète APA : Melland, H., (1996), Great Researcher…Good Teacher?, Journal of Professional Nursing, 12,
(1), 31-38.
- Auteur(s) :
- Revue :
2. Copies
- Copie en ligne :
- Copie locale : Fichier:Melland 1996.pdf
- Copie physique :
3. Mots-clés
4. Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between the research productivity and teaching effectiveness of baccalaureate nurse educators. This was a nonexperimental, correlational, retrospective study. Sixty baccalaureate nurse educators completed a questionnaire that assessed their research productivity and administered a teaching effectiveness questionnaire to all students in their classes in a given week. No relationship of significance was found between faculty research productivity and teaching effectiveness. Faculty at research institutions were found to be significantly higher research producers than faculty at either comprehensive or liberal arts institutions. No significant difference was found in the teaching effectiveness between faculty employed at research, comprehensive, or liberal arts institutions. Recommendations included (1) broadening the definition of research to include the scholarship of integration, discovery, application, and teaching; (2) implementation of two career tracks for faculty in higher education, with different reward structures for each; and (3) allowing the academic department as opposed to individual faculty to be the basic unit of evaluation. (Index words: Faculty, publishing; Publish-or-perish; Research, universities; Scholarship.) J Prof Nuts 12: 31-38, 1996. Copyright © 1996 by W.B. Saunders Company
5. Résumé (facultatif)
- Une des études montrant l'absence de corrélation entre performance en recherche et en enseignement (vs le mythe "Un bon chercheur fait un bon enseignant")
- Intéressant aussi pour le petit cas initial où Melland compare deux enseigants imaginaires, Pr Jones et Pr Smith, l'un dans une optique qui semble donner raison
The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between the research productivity and teaching effectiveness of baccalaureate nurse educators. This was a nonexperimental, correlational, retrospective study. Sixty baccalaureate nurse educators completed a questionnaire that assessed their research productivity and administered a teaching effectiveness questionnaire to all students in their classes in a given week. No relationship of significance was found between faculty research productivity and teaching effectiveness. Faculty at research institutions were found to be significantly higher research producers than faculty at either comprehensive or liberal arts institutions. No significant difference was found in the teaching effectiveness between faculty employed at research, comprehensive, or liberal arts institutions. Recommendations included (1) broadening the definition of research to include the scholarship of integration, discovery, application, and teaching; (2) implementation of two career tracks for faculty in higher education, with different reward structures for each; and (3) allowing the academic department as opposed to individual faculty to be the basic unit of evaluation.