« Hoeft 2012 » : différence entre les versions
Aucun résumé des modifications |
|||
| Ligne 3 : | Ligne 3 : | ||
<!-- La catégorie article est une sous-catégorie de référence. Elle inclut les articles publiés dans des revues ou des journaux.--> | <!-- La catégorie article est une sous-catégorie de référence. Elle inclut les articles publiés dans des revues ou des journaux.--> | ||
= | = Why University Students Don't Read: What Professors Can Do To Increase Compliance = | ||
<!-- Mettre le titre supra pour qu'il apparaisse en grand au sommet de la page --> | <!-- Mettre le titre supra pour qu'il apparaisse en grand au sommet de la page --> | ||
| Ligne 47 : | Ligne 47 : | ||
<!-- Copier / coller ici l'abstract --> | <!-- Copier / coller ici l'abstract --> | ||
This article reports findings from two studies assessing reading compliance among first semester freshmen at a small Midwestern two-year liberal arts university. The first study assessed reading compliance of students enrolled in two sections of First Year Seminar, finding that 46% of students reported that they read assignments, yet only 55% of those students were able to demonstrate the most basic level of comprehension of the material they claimed to have read. Reasons most frequently cited by students to explain their failure to read and advice that noncompliant readers say will increase their compliance are identified. The second study assessed reading compliance in a 3-course learning community of first semester freshmen, incorporating one piece of noncompliant reader advice in each of the courses, finding that quizzes and graded journals greatly increased reading compliance. | |||
Version du 1 mai 2015 à 17:01
Why University Students Don't Read: What Professors Can Do To Increase Compliance
1. Références
- Référence complète APA : Hoeft, M. E. (2012). Why University Students Don't Read: What Professors Can Do To Increase Compliance, International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 6/2, Article 12.
- Auteur(s) : Mary Hoeft
2. Copies
- Copie en ligne : http://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/ij-sotl/vol6/iss2/12/
- Copie locale : Fichier:Hoeft 2012.pdf
- Copie physique :
3. Mots-clés
4. Abstract
This article reports findings from two studies assessing reading compliance among first semester freshmen at a small Midwestern two-year liberal arts university. The first study assessed reading compliance of students enrolled in two sections of First Year Seminar, finding that 46% of students reported that they read assignments, yet only 55% of those students were able to demonstrate the most basic level of comprehension of the material they claimed to have read. Reasons most frequently cited by students to explain their failure to read and advice that noncompliant readers say will increase their compliance are identified. The second study assessed reading compliance in a 3-course learning community of first semester freshmen, incorporating one piece of noncompliant reader advice in each of the courses, finding that quizzes and graded journals greatly increased reading compliance.
5. Résumé (facultatif)