« Bernstein Burnett et al 2007 » : différence entre les versions
(Page créée avec « Catégorie:livre <!-- La catégorie livre est une sous-catégorie de référence. Elle inclut les ouvrages publiés chez un éditeur. Les rapports, thèses et mémoires ... ») |
|||
| Ligne 51 : | Ligne 51 : | ||
== 4. Quart de couverture == | == 4. Quart de couverture == | ||
<!-- Copier / coller ici le quart de couverture à partir d'internet --> | <!-- Copier / coller ici le quart de couverture à partir d'internet --> | ||
With higher education’s refocus over the last three decades on bringing greater recognition and reward to good teaching, the idea of peer review has gained popularity. One tool for documenting and reflecting on the quality of teaching and student learning is a course portfolio. A course portfolio captures and makes visible the careful, difficult, and intentional scholarly work of planning and teaching a course. | |||
Illustrated through examples of course portfolios created during a four-year project on peer review of teaching, this book demonstrates how faculty can integrate well-designed peer review into their daily professional lives, thus improving their teaching by incorporating a means for assessment and collaboration and revealing the student learning that happens with effective teaching within an institutional reward systems. | |||
This book offers a model of peer review intended to help faculty document, assess, reflect on, and improve teaching and student learning through the use of a course portfolio. It features a rich collection of materials—including four dozen exhibits to help assemble a portfolio, reviewers’ comments, and reflections drawn from more than 200 professors and portfolio authors in various disciplines and institutions—that faculty can use to develop their course portfolios to be used in their peer review of teaching. | |||
<br> | <br> | ||
== 5. Table des matières (facultatif) == | == 5. Table des matières (facultatif) == | ||
Dernière version du 11 juin 2015 à 16:35
Making Teaching and Learning Visible: Course Portfolios and the Peer Review of Teaching
1. Références
- Référence complète APA : Daniel Bernstein, Amy Nelson Burnett, Amy Goodburn, Paul Savory (2007). Making Teaching and Learning Visible: Course Portfolios and the Peer Review of Teaching. John Wiley & Sons.
- Auteur(s) : Daniel Bernstein, Amy Burnett, Amy Goodburn, Paul Savory
2. Copies
- Copie électronique en ligne :
- Copie électronique locale :
- Copie physique CP :
- Copie physique en bibliothèque :
3. Mots-clés
4. Quart de couverture
With higher education’s refocus over the last three decades on bringing greater recognition and reward to good teaching, the idea of peer review has gained popularity. One tool for documenting and reflecting on the quality of teaching and student learning is a course portfolio. A course portfolio captures and makes visible the careful, difficult, and intentional scholarly work of planning and teaching a course. Illustrated through examples of course portfolios created during a four-year project on peer review of teaching, this book demonstrates how faculty can integrate well-designed peer review into their daily professional lives, thus improving their teaching by incorporating a means for assessment and collaboration and revealing the student learning that happens with effective teaching within an institutional reward systems.
This book offers a model of peer review intended to help faculty document, assess, reflect on, and improve teaching and student learning through the use of a course portfolio. It features a rich collection of materials—including four dozen exhibits to help assemble a portfolio, reviewers’ comments, and reflections drawn from more than 200 professors and portfolio authors in various disciplines and institutions—that faculty can use to develop their course portfolios to be used in their peer review of teaching.
5. Table des matières (facultatif)
6. Résumé personnel (facultatif)
7. Voir aussi