« Geake 2008 » : différence entre les versions
Aucun résumé des modifications |
|||
Ligne 39 : | Ligne 39 : | ||
<!-- Mettre ici la liste de sujets sur lesquels porte l'article, entre doubles crochets, afin de pouvoir retrouver les publications par sujet.--> | <!-- Mettre ici la liste de sujets sur lesquels porte l'article, entre doubles crochets, afin de pouvoir retrouver les publications par sujet.--> | ||
* [[mythe]] | * [[mythe]] | ||
* [[style d'apprentissage]] | |||
* [[intelligences multiples]] | |||
<br> | <br> |
Dernière version du 4 avril 2013 à 10:04
Neuromythologies in education
1. Références
- Référence complète APA : Geake, J. (2008): Neuromythologies in education, Educational Research, 50:2, 123-133
- Auteur(s) : John Geake
- Revue : Educational Research
2. Copies
- Copie en ligne :
- Copie locale : Fichier:Geake 2008.pdf
- Copie physique :
3. Mots-clés
4. Abstract
5. Résumé (facultatif)
- We use most of our brains most of the time, not some restricted 10% brain usage. This is because our brains are densely interconnected, and we exploit this interconnectivity to enable our primitively evolved primate brains to live in our complex modern human world.
- Although brain imaging delineates areas of higher (and lower) activation in response to particular tasks, thinking involves coordinated interconnectivity from both sides of the brain, not separate left- and right-brained thinking. High intelligence requires higher levels of inter-hemispheric and other connected activity.
- The brain’s interconnectivity includes the senses, especially vision and hearing. We do not learn by one sense alone, hence VAK learning styles do not reflect how our brains actually learn, nor the individual differences we observe in classrooms.
- Neuroimaging studies do not support multiple intelligences; in fact, the opposite is true. Through the activity of its frontal cortices, among other areas, the human brain seems to operate with general intelligence, applied to multiple areas of endeavour.
- Studies of educational effectiveness of applying any of these ideas in the classroom have failed to find any educational benefits. (...) teachers should seek independent scientific validation before adopting brain-based products in their classrooms. A more sceptical approach to educational panaceas could contribute to an enhanced professionalism of the field.